AI for Dev and Prod

Reviews the code, maps the blast radius, runs RCA - on any agent you already run.

Install Niro
npx @niroai/niro start
Request access
From the founder

The codebase nobody
fully understands

1:26 · captions on screen
Solutions

One index
Dev to incident

Your repos
api-gateway
payment-svc
order-mgmt
infra-config
web-frontend
CodeGraph
50,000 nodes · 1.2M edges
Re-indexed on push
What your team gets
01 Code Graph
Callers, callees and imports - across every repo.
02 MCP 35 tools
Claude, Cursor or any agent, structurally aware.
03 Review Agents 12 passes
Blast radius behind every changed line, not just the difference.
04 RCA 11ms
Production failures walked backward to the line.
CodeGraph

Ask the codebase
Cite the answer

Every repo, class, function and call is a node. Run a query and watch Niro walk the edges - deterministically, across service boundaries.

The ceiling

Same question
Two ways to answer it

Why is checkout failing in production?
Your AI, file-by-file bash · rg · sed · git
files
tool calls
cost
elapsed
Best guess: PaymentProcessor.execute - unverified
It never opened infra-config/. The cause was never in the files it read.
Your AI + Niro 10 MCP calls · traverse
files
tool calls
cost
elapsed
RetryConfig.java:47 - verified, with the evidence chain
It didn't search for the file. It already knew the edge existed.
Incident agent

Alerts in,
verified causes out

A team of Niro agents investigates in parallel on the graph - and hands you the high-confidence causes, with the evidence chain behind each one.

See the incident agent
Agent team · INC-2041 checkout-router p95 · alert 01:19
lead triager investigator ×2 verifier
01:20 triager 3 changes in the blast radius; flag flip in infra-config@00:58 ranks first
01:21 invstg-a route() → OrderReconciler.batchUpdateOrderEvents - path exists only behind the flag
01:22 invstg-b row locks in HashMap iteration order - OrderReconciler.java:214
01:24 verifier deadlock rate first moves at 01:12, the moment pods scaled 2 → 27
ROOT CAUSE DECLARED 01:27 · confidence 96%
8m
alert to cause
26
tool calls
3
repos crossed
0
files read
Root cause verified · 7 evidence items
OrderReconciler.java:214 - row locks in HashMap iteration order

The checkout-v2 flag opened the path; the 01:12 scale-out to 27 pods made circular waits probable. Every link is an edge in the graph or a line in the deploy log.

Review agents

Multiple reviewers read
every line you didn't write

#447 payment: cache user lookup in processPayment alex.k · 3 files +82 −14
Reviewers
DI · deep investigation * · rulepack

Verdict
blocking
warnings
cross-repo
Benchmarks

Measured, not promised

42 real developer queries · 3 production codebases · Claude Opus 4.6 through Claude Code, with and without Niro's MCP tools. Same model, same prompts, single run each.

67%
cheaper
$14.61 → $4.82
faster
56 min → 19 min
fewer tool calls
914 → 169
42%
still fail without it
8 of 19 retried queries
Claude Code + retries vs Your AI + Niro
Objection

Can't the AI just retry until it gets there?

Yes - and 8 of 19 retried queries never got there at all. Retries can't see a dependency that was never in the files they read.

Integrations

Plug Niro into the stack you already have

Integrations across source control, cloud, and the tools your team lives in.

Browse all integrations
sources and surfaces
+ more
Savings estimator

ROI Calculator

Based on 53s saved per query · 42 production queries measured

Annual productivity recovered
ROI
Payback
Net

FAQ

What people ask
before they install

What exactly is Niro?

Niro parses every repository into one semantic graph - symbols, calls, config, data resources and events - and answers structural questions on that graph instead of reading files. Three things run on top of it. Your engineers query the graph directly from the CLI. Your agents reach the same graph as 35 tools over MCP, with no per-tool wiring. And Niro's own agents use it to review pull requests and to investigate production incidents. One index, one set of facts, every consumer reading the same thing.

Is this not just semantic code search?

Search ranks text by resemblance. Niro resolves relationships at AST depth: callers, callees, imports, inheritance, HTTP endpoints, data resources, message queues and config keys are edges on a graph, so a question about structure has an answer rather than a ranked guess. A call that crosses a service boundary is an edge like any other, which is the part no amount of searching one checkout can reach.

Does my code leave my machine?

That is your decision, not ours. Local mode (coming soon) indexes and answers on your own machine and can use your own model key. Managed uploads source over multipart so we can index it. Your own VPC, self-hosted and air-gapped keep everything inside your network. In every shape, source moves over multipart and is never written to logs.

Which agents and which languages?

Fourteen MCP clients, including Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex CLI, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Copilot CLI and Antigravity - plus anything else that speaks MCP. Nine languages are parsed: Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, C#, Kotlin, PHP and Ruby.

How long until it is useful?

One npx command, one sign-in, one folder. Node 18 or newer is the only prerequisite. After that the graph re-indexes incrementally as files change, so there is no nightly rebuild to wait on and no full re-index to schedule.

What happens on a branch you have not indexed?

Niro refuses to answer, and says so. Every question routes to the project covering your repo and current branch; on a branch no project covers it offers to build a temporary project rather than answering from stale code. A confidently wrong answer is the expensive kind.

Stop reading files
Start knowing the code

Root-cause analysis is in private beta. You can start indexing in the next two minutes.

Or run npx @niroai/niro start and skip the queue.